Reassessing Collateral Residuary Inheritance in Indonesia through Al-Sarakhsī’s Al-Mabsūṭ and Supreme Court Jurisprudence
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study examines collateral residuary inheritance by comparing al-Sarakhsī’s discussion in Al-Mabsūṭ with the Compilation of Islamic Law and literature on Indonesian Supreme Court decisions. It uses doctrinal research combining conceptual and statutory analysis with a limited examination of judicial materials. The analysis distinguishes kinship-based entitlement, the interpretation of walad as including daughters, and the authors’ proposal to consider care and financial contributions. The cited classical passages do not establish actual economic support as a general condition of residuary entitlement. Judicial literature indicates that the interpretation of walad may affect the position of the deceased’s siblings, but does not demonstrate a general contribution-based rule. The article proposes a conditional and proportionate model for legislative debate, subject to a clear legal basis, protection of fixed shares, and defined evidentiary safeguards. Social contribution alone does not authorize the cancellation of an inheritance entitlement under existing law.
Article Details
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
References
Al-Sarakhsī, Muḥammad ibn Aḥmad. Al-Mabsūṭ. Vol. 29. Beirut: Dār al-Maʿrifah, 1993.
Al-Sarakhsī, Muḥammad ibn Aḥmad. Al-Mabsūṭ. Vol. 30. Beirut: Dār al-Maʿrifah, 1993.
Al-Zuḥaylī, Wahbah. Al-Fiqh al-Islāmī wa Adillatuhu. Vol. 7. Damascus: Dār al-Fikr, 1985.
Badan Pusat Statistik. “Persentase Rumah Tangga Menurut Provinsi, Daerah Tempat Tinggal, dan Jenis Kelamin Kepala Rumah Tangga, 2009–2023.” https://www.bps.go.id/id/statistics-table/1/MTYwNCMx/persentase-rumah-tangga-menurut-provinsi-daerah-tempat-tinggal-dan-jenis-kelamin-kepala-rumah-tangga-2009-2023.html.
Ghafur, Abd., Dwi Aprilia Widyastutik, and Iftitah Firdausiyah. “Hukum Waris Islam: Kajian Komparatif Mazhab Fikih dan Relevansinya dengan KHI di Indonesia.” RIGGS: Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Digital Business 4, no. 4 (2025): 6234–6243. https://doi.org/10.31004/riggs.v4i4.4310.
Hakim, Arif Rahman. “Putusan Hakim Mahkamah Syar‘iyah Sigli Dan Pengadilan Agama Banjarbaru Tentang Kewarisan Anak Perempuan Bersama Saudara.” Sakina: Journal of Family Studies 4, no. 3 (2020).
Hazairin. Hukum Kewarisan Bilateral Menurut Al-Qur’an Dan Hadith. Jakarta: Tintamas, n.d.
Indonesia. Compilation of Islamic Law. Disseminated through Presidential Instruction No. 1 of 1991.
Indonesia. Law No. 48 of 2009 concerning Judicial Power.
Indonesia. Supreme Court. Decision No. 86 K/AG/1994.
Islamiyati, Ery Agus Priyono, Dewi Hendrawati, and Achmad Arief Budiman. “Eksistensi Yurisprudensi Mahkamah Agung (MA) Dalam Penegakan Hukum Keluarga Islam Indonesia.” Law, Development and Justice Review 3, no. 1 (2020): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.14710/ldjr.v3i1.7349.
Kamarusdiana, Muhammad Ilham Fuadi, and Muhammad Ishar Helmi. “Keadilan Waris Islam dalam Kedudukan Anak Perempuan sebagai Hajib Hirman terhadap Saudara dalam Putusan Mahkamah Agung.” Al-Manahij: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam 15, no. 2 (2021): 221–232. https://doi.org/10.24090/mnh.v15i2.4960.
Khairunnisa Khairunnisa, Putri Utami, and Dwi Noviani, M.Pd.I.. “Konsep Ashabah dalam Warisan Islam Menurut Beberapa Hadis Bukhori.” Intellektika : Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa 2, no. 4 (2024): 14–22. https://doi.org/10.59841/intellektika.v2i4.1256.
Mahmud, Sutan, Muhammad Hasan, and Moh. Fadhil. “Analisis Putusan Perkara Perdata Mahkamah Agung Nomor 706 K/Ag/2015 Dalam Menetapkan Bagian Anak Perempuan Bersama Saudara.” Al-Usroh 1, no. 2 (2021): 171–182. https://doi.org/10.24260/al-usroh.v1i2.429.
Supreme Court of Indonesia and partner institutions. Pedoman Mengadili Perkara Perempuan Berhadapan dengan Hukum. https://kepaniteraan.mahkamahagung.go.id/images/artikel/pmppbdh.pdf.