A Mudharabah Perspective on the Application of the Business Judgment Rule to the Liability of State-Owned Enterprise Directors (A Study of Ira Puspadewi's Rehabilitation)

Article Sidebar

PDF
Published: 2026-10-18
DOI: https://doi.org/10.70308/svw1v654
Keywords:
Business Judgment Rule, state-owned enterprises, mudharabah, directors’ liability, rehabilitation

Main Article Content

Nasywa Adina1
1 Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara image/svg+xml
Aida Nur Hasanah2
2 Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara image/svg+xml

Abstract

This article examines the business judgment rule (BJR) in the liability of Indonesian state-owned enterprise directors through PT ASDP Indonesia Ferry’s acquisition of PT Jembatan Nusantara. It also examines mudharabah and the presidential rehabilitation of Ira Puspadewi. Using normative legal research with statutory, conceptual, and case approaches, the study finds that BJR protection requires cumulative proof of absence of fault, good-faith and careful management, freedom from conflicts of interest, and loss-prevention measures. The dissent on due care does not displace the majority’s contrary assessment of abuse of authority. The mudharabah analogy distinguishes normal commercial loss from loss arising from transgression, negligence, or breach of trust, without equating SOE governance with that contract. Presidential rehabilitation is assessed as a separate constitutional act. The article proposes clearer evidentiary standards for directors’ liability.

Article Details

Issue

Vol. 4 No. 2 (2026): Adagium: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum

Section

Articles
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

Adina, Nasywa, and Aida Nur Hasanah. 2026. “A Mudharabah Perspective on the Application of the Business Judgment Rule to the Liability of State-Owned Enterprise Directors (A Study of Ira Puspadewi’s Rehabilitation)”. Adagium: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum 4 (2): 1601-16. https://doi.org/10.70308/svw1v654.

References

Alilia, Valentina Wahyu, Dian Dwi Cahyani, Salsabila Fitri Ananda Santosa, Mufaida Shofia Arifah, and Waluyo. “Tanggung Jawab Mudharib terhadap Kerugian dalam Mudharabah Persefektif Fiqh Muamalah.” JISEF: Journal of International Sharia Economics and Financial 4, no. 1 (2025): 43–58. https://doi.org/10.62668/jisef.v4i01.1535⁠.

Anggita, P., M. Taher, and B. Agitha. “Analisis Yuridis Penerapan Doktrin Business Judgment Rule dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2025 tentang BUMN: Antara Kepastian Hukum Direksi dan Potensi Impunitas Korupsi.” Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik 6, no. 3 (2026): 2588–97.

Anshari, Mulya, and Cahaya Permata. “Deforestasi Hutan Lindung dalam Proyek Strategis Nasional Food Estate: Perspektif Maqashid Syariah.” Al Qalam: Jurnal Ilmiah Keagamaan dan Kemasyarakatan 18, no. 3 (2024): 2031–47. https://doi.org/10.35931/aq.v18i3.3499⁠.

Bondowoso, S. B., and D. Afrilia. “Pertanggungjawaban Direksi BUMN terhadap Kerugian Negara Berdasarkan Regulasi Pemerintahan Sektor Perusahaan dan Pidana.” Lex Stricta: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 4, no. 1 (2025): 13–22.

Central Jakarta District Court. Decision Number 68/Pid.Sus-TPK/2025/PN Jkt.Pst. November 20, 2025. Indonesian Supreme Court Decision Directory. https://putusan3.mahkamahagung.go.id/⁠.

Dewan Syariah Nasional–Majelis Ulama Indonesia. Fatwa Number 07/DSN-MUI/IV/2000 concerning Mudharabah Financing (Qiradh). April 2000. https://ojk.go.id/id/kanal/syariah/regulasi/fatwa-dsn-mui/Pages/fatwa-nomor-07-dsn-mui-iv-2000.aspx⁠.

Dewan Syariah Nasional–Majelis Ulama Indonesia. Fatwa Number 115/DSN-MUI/IX/2017 concerning the Mudharabah Contract. September 19, 2017. https://dsnmui.or.id/kategori/fatwa/page/6/⁠.

Dianto, Femas Rama, Sigit Sapto Nugroho, and Angga Pramodya Pradhana. “Analisis Hukum Pemberian Rehabilitasi kepada Mantan Direksi ASDP dalam Perkara Korupsi Berdasarkan Putusan Nomor 68/Pid.Sus-TPK/2025/PN Jakarta Pusat.” Dinamika Hukum 27, no. 1 (2026): 85–97. https://doi.org/10.35315/dh.v27i1.10556⁠.

Dina, Monica Elizabeth. “Penerapan Prinsip Business Judgement Rule pada Badan Usaha Milik Negara.” Lex Prospicit 3, no. 1 (2025): 1–17. https://doi.org/10.19166/lp.v3i1.7210⁠.

Farhan, Gusti Muhammad, Masduki Ahmad, and Siti Nur Intihani. “Analisis Yuridis Aspek Itikad Tidak Baik dalam Penerapan Prinsip Business Judgement Rule yang Dilakukan oleh Direksi Perusahaan dalam Perspektif Kepastian Hukum.” Jurnal Hukum Jurisdictie 7, no. 1 (2025): 23–44. https://doi.org/10.34005/jhj.v6i2.158⁠.

Farizy, Mohammad Rafi Al, Dodik Prihatin AN, Fiska Maulidian Nugroho, and Bhim Prakoso. LPI dalam Lingkar Pertanggungjawaban Kerugian Negara. Yogyakarta: Bintang Semesta Media, 2023.

Harianto, Budi. “Kerugian Negara Diakibatkan oleh Badan Usaha Milik Negara (BUMN) sebagai Kerugian Keuangan Negara: Penelitian.” Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat dan Riset Pendidikan 3, no. 4 (2025): 3899–3905. https://doi.org/10.31004/jerkin.v3i4.1184⁠.

Hasanah, Aida Nur, and Uswatun Hasanah. “Challenges of Business Judgment Rule Implementation as an Effort to Protect Company Directors in Indonesia.” Ius Civile: Refleksi Penegakan Hukum dan Keadilan 9, no. 1 (2025): 113–34. https://doi.org/10.35308/jic.v9i1.11552⁠.

Hatta, M. “Implementasi Mudharabah pada Lembaga Keuangan Syariah.” Milkiyah: Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi Syariah 1, no. 1 (2022).

Lestari, Sartika Nanda. “Business Judgment Rule sebagai Immunity Doctrine bagi Direksi Badan Usaha Milik Negara di Indonesia.” Notarius 8, no. 2 (2015): 302–14. https://doi.org/10.14710/nts.v8i2.10261⁠.

Maristella, Debora, Firdaus, and Maryati Bachtiar. “Penerapan Prinsip Duty of Care oleh Direksi Perseroan Terbatas di Indonesia.” Jurnal Online Mahasiswa (JOM) Bidang Ilmu Hukum 5, no. 2 (2018): 1–14.

Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Penelitian Hukum. Revised edition. Jakarta: Kencana, 2021.

Ministry of State Secretariat of the Republic of Indonesia. “Mensesneg Umumkan Keputusan Presiden: Hak Rehabilitasi Diberikan kepada Eks Dirut ASDP dan Jajaran.” November 25, 2025. https://www.setneg.go.id/baca/index/mensesneg_umumkan_keputusan_presiden_hak_rehabilitasi_diberikan_kepada_eks_dirut_asdp_dan_jajaran⁠.

Novera, Rahmah Perindha. “Potensi Benturan Kepentingan Direksi dengan Pemegang Saham dalam Perseroan Perorangan.” UNES Law Review 6, no. 1 (2023): 3948–58. https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.1223⁠.

Priyono, Eko, Agus Surono, and Sadino. “Doktrin Business Judgment Rule dalam Memberikan Perlindungan Hukum kepada Direksi BUMN (Studi Kasus PT. PLN).” Jurnal Magister Ilmu Hukum 7, no. 2 (2022): 29–43. https://doi.org/10.36722/jmih.v7i2.1264⁠.

Rahman, Faqih Zuhdi. “Batasan Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Direksi BUMN dalam Perspektif Business Judgment Rule Pasca Revisi UU BUMN: Limits of Criminal Liability of SOE Directors under the Business Judgment Rule after SOE Law Revision.” Semarang Law Review (SLR) 7, no. 1 (2026): 327–50. https://doi.org/10.26623/slr.v7i1.13983⁠.

Republic of Indonesia. Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia of 1945.

Republic of Indonesia. Law Number 16 of 2025 concerning the Fourth Amendment to Law Number 19 of 2003 on State-Owned Enterprises. October 6, 2025. https://peraturan.go.id/id/uu-no-16-tahun-2025⁠.

Republic of Indonesia. Law Number 17 of 2003 concerning State Finance.

Republic of Indonesia. Law Number 31 of 1999 concerning the Eradication of Corruption, as amended by Law Number 20 of 2001.

Republic of Indonesia. Law Number 40 of 2007 concerning Limited Liability Companies.

Ritonga, Mustakin Rizki, and Tetty Marlina Tarigan. “Implikasi Instruksi Presiden No. 1 Tahun 2025 tentang Efisiensi Belanja dalam Pelaksanaan APBN Tahun Anggaran 2025 terhadap Ibu Kota Negara Perspektif Siyasah Dusturiyah.” Law Jurnal 7, no. 1 (2026): 994–1008. https://doi.org/10.46576/lj.v7i1.9881⁠.

Sa’diyah, Mahmudatus, and Meuthiya Athifa Arifin. “Mudharabah dalam Fiqih dan Perbankan Syari’ah.” Equilibrium: Jurnal Ekonomi Syariah 1, no. 2 (2013): 302–23. https://doi.org/10.21043/equilibrium.v1i2.215⁠.

Sarwono, C. A., and A. C. Irawati. “Problematika Kepastian Hukum Rehabilitasi Terdakwa Pasca Putusan Inkracht (Studi Yuridis Putusan Nomor 68/Pid.Sus-TPK/2025/PN Jakarta Pusat).” Iuris Studia: Jurnal Kajian Hukum 6, no. 3 (2025): 958–65. https://doi.org/10.55357/is.v6i3.1138⁠.

Septiani, Zahra Aqilah, and Annisa Sativa. “Analisis Yuridis terhadap Peraturan POLRI Nomor 10 Tahun 2025 tentang Penugasan Aktif pada 17 Kementerian/Lembaga dalam Perspektif Siyasah Dusturiyah.” Jurnal QOSIM: Jurnal Pendidikan Sosial & Humaniora 4, no. 4 (2026): 6426–34. https://doi.org/10.61104/jq.v4i4.11104⁠.

Setiawati, Anisa Deny, and Mokhamad Gisa Vitrana. “Doktrin Business Judgment Rule dalam UU BUMN: Batas Tanggung Jawab Direksi dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi.” Jurnal Rechtens 14, no. 1 (2025): 155–70. https://doi.org/10.56013/rechtens.v14i1.4256⁠.

Siregar, Rahma Dewi, Mustapa Khamal Rokan, and Annisa Sativa. “Eksekusi Jaminan pada Pembiayaan Mudharabah karena Force Majeur Ditinjau dari Fatwa Dewan Syariah Nasional No. 07 DSN-MUI/IV/2000 (Studi Kasus BSI Kecamatan Padang Bolak Kabupaten Padang Lawas Utara).” ALADALAH: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora 1, no. 4 (2023): 57–71. https://doi.org/10.59246/aladalah.v1i4.503⁠.

Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia. Decision Number 1076 K/Pid.Sus/2025. February 28, 2025. Indonesian Supreme Court Decision Directory. https://putusan3.mahkamahagung.go.id/⁠.

Umar, Munazar. “Business Judgment Rule dalam UU BUMN 2025: Antara Perlindungan Direksi dan Celah Impunitas.” Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum 4, no. 2 (2026): 5685–93. https://doi.org/10.61104/alz.v4i2.4820⁠.

Wardani, Desty Sari. “Perlindungan Direksi terhadap Keputusan Bisnis melalui Penerapan Prinsip Business Judgement Rules di Amerika Serikat, Jepang, dan Indonesia.” Dharmasisya: Jurnal Program Magister Hukum FHUI 2, no. 3 (2023): 1139–52.

Zharfan, Muhammad, Arsy Nur Bagus Sandy, Hafiz Fathi Huga Ekoputro, Muhammad Ridho, and Mahipal. “Tinjauan Yuridis terhadap Gagalnya Pelaksanaan Akad Mudharabah Koperasi Karya Usaha Mandiri Syariah Bogor dalam Sengketa Investasi Syariah.” Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum 3, no. 2 (2025): 188–97. https://doi.org/10.61104/alz.v3i2.967⁠.lilia, V. W., et al. “Tanggung Jawab Mudharib terhadap Kerugian dalam Mudharabah Perspektif Fiqh Muamalah.” JISEF: Journal of International Sharia Economics and Finance 4, no. 1 (2025): 43–58.

Anggita, P., M. Taher, and B. Agitha. “Analisis Yuridis Penerapan Doktrin Business Judgment Rule dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2025 tentang BUMN: Antara Kepastian Hukum Direksi dan Potensi Impunitas Korupsi.” Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik 6, no. 3 (2026): 2588–97.

Bondowoso, S. B., and D. Afrilia. “Pertanggungjawaban Direksi BUMN terhadap Kerugian Negara Berdasarkan Regulasi Pemerintahan Sektor Perusahaan dan Pidana.” Lex Stricta: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 4, no. 1 (2025): 13–22.

Central Jakarta District Court. Decision Number 68/Pid.Sus-TPK/2025/PN Jkt.Pst. November 20, 2025. Indonesian Supreme Court Decision Directory. https://putusan3.mahkamahagung.go.id/.

Dewan Syariah Nasional–Majelis Ulama Indonesia. Fatwa Number 07/DSN-MUI/IV/2000 concerning Mudharabah Financing (Qiradh). April 2000. https://ojk.go.id/id/kanal/syariah/regulasi/fatwa-dsn-mui/Pages/fatwa-nomor-07-dsn-mui-iv-2000.aspx.

Dewan Syariah Nasional–Majelis Ulama Indonesia. Fatwa Number 115/DSN-MUI/IX/2017 concerning the Mudharabah Contract. September 19, 2017. https://dsnmui.or.id/kategori/fatwa/page/6/.

Hasanah, Aida Nur, and Uswatun Hasanah. “Challenges of Business Judgment Rule Implementation as an Effort to Protect Company Directors in Indonesia.” Ius Civile: Refleksi Penegakan Hukum dan Keadilan 9, no. 1 (2025): 113–34. https://doi.org/10.35308/jic.v9i1.11552.

Hatta, M. “Implementasi Mudharabah pada Lembaga Keuangan Syariah.” Milkiyah: Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi Syariah 1, no. 1 (2022).

Lestari, Sartika Nanda. “Business Judgment Rule sebagai Immunity Doctrine bagi Direksi Badan Usaha Milik Negara di Indonesia.” Notarius 8, no. 2 (2015): 302– 14. https://doi.org/10.14710/nts.v8i2.10261.

Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Penelitian Hukum. Revised edition. Jakarta: Kencana, 2021.

Ministry of State Secretariat of the Republic of Indonesia. “Mensesneg Umumkan Keputusan Presiden: Hak Rehabilitasi Diberikan kepada Eks Dirut ASDP dan Jajaran.” November 25, 2025. https://www.setneg.go.id/baca/index/mensesneg_umumkan_keputusan_presiden_hak_rehabilitasi_diberikan_kepada_eks_dirut_asdp_dan_jajaran.

Priyono, Eko, Agus Surono, and Sadino. “Doktrin Business Judgment Rule dalam Memberikan Perlindungan Hukum kepada Direksi BUMN (Studi Kasus PT. PLN).” Jurnal Magister Ilmu Hukum 7, no. 2 (2022): 29–43. https://doi.org/10.36722/jmih.v7i2.1264.

Republic of Indonesia. Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia of 1945.

Republic of Indonesia. Law Number 16 of 2025 concerning the Fourth Amendment to Law Number 19 of 2003 on State-Owned Enterprises. October 6, 2025. https://peraturan.go.id/id/uu-no-16-tahun-2025.

Republic of Indonesia. Law Number 17 of 2003 concerning State Finance.

Republic of Indonesia. Law Number 31 of 1999 concerning the Eradication of Corruption, as amended by Law Number 20 of 2001.

Republic of Indonesia. Law Number 40 of 2007 concerning Limited Liability Companies.

Sa’diyah, Mahmudatus, and Meuthiya Athifa Arifin. “Mudharabah dalam Fiqih dan Perbankan Syari’ah.” Equilibrium: Jurnal Ekonomi Syariah 1, no. 2 (2013): 302– 23. https://doi.org/10.21043/equilibrium.v1i2.215.

Setiawati, Anisa Deny, and Mokhamad Gisa Vitrana. “Doktrin Business Judgment Rule dalam UU BUMN: Batas Tanggung Jawab Direksi dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi.” Jurnal Rechtens 14, no. 1 (2025): 155–70. https://doi.org/10.56013/rechtens.v14i1.4256.

Siregar, Rahma Dewi, Mustapa Khamal Rokan, and Annisa Sativa. “Eksekusi Jaminan pada Pembiayaan Mudharabah karena Force Majeur Ditinjau dari Fatwa Dewan Syariah Nasional No. 07 DSN-MUI/IV/2000.” ALADALAH: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora 1, no. 4 (2023): 57–71. https://doi.org/10.59246/aladalah.v1i4.503.

Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia. Decision Number 1076 K/Pid.Sus/2025. February 28, 2025. Indonesian Supreme Court Decision Directory. https://putusan3.mahkamahagung.go.id/.

Wardani, Dwi S. “Perlindungan Direksi terhadap Keputusan Bisnis melalui Penerapan Prinsip Business Judgment Rules di Amerika Serikat, Jepang, dan Indonesia.” Jurnal Program Magister Hukum FHUI 2, no. 3 (2022): 1139–52.