A Juridical Analysis of Evidence for Trading Imported Processed Food without a BPOM Distribution Permit (Judgment No. 438/Pid.Sus/2021/PN Pbr)
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study aims to analyze the legal considerations of judges in proving the case of illegal imported food products without a distribution permit from the Food and Drug Supervisory Agency (BPOM) in Decision of the Pekanbaru District Court Number 438/Pid.Sus/2021/PN Pbr, as well as to analyze whether the evidence in the decision is in accordance with criminal law provisions and laws and regulations concerning food. This research employs a normative legal research method with a descriptive-analytical approach, using a statutory approach, a case approach, and a conceptual approach. The legal materials used consist of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials, which were collected through library research and analyzed qualitatively. The results of the study indicate that the legal considerations of the panel of judges in the case were based on an assessment of the evidence and facts revealed during the trial in determining the fulfillment of the elements of the criminal offense as regulated under Article 142 in conjunction with Article 91 paragraph (1) of Law Number 18 of 2012 concerning Food. The proof in the case was conducted by relating the evidence presented at trial to the defendant's act of distributing food products that did not have a distribution permit. Based on the analysis, the evidence considered by the panel of judges was related to the provisions of criminal procedural law and the applicable laws and regulations concerning food, thereby providing a basis for the judges to find the defendant proven to have committed the criminal offense as charged. Therefore, the legal considerations of the judges in Decision Number 438/Pid.Sus/2021/PN Pbr demonstrate the application of criminal evidentiary provisions in determining the fulfillment of the elements of a food-related criminal offense involving food products without a distribution permit.
Article Details
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
References
Adami Chazawi. Pelajaran Hukum Pidana Bagian I. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2013.
Ahmadi Miru and Sutarman Yodo. Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen. Edisi Revisi, Cetakan ke-11. Depok: Rajawali Pers, 2019.
Ahmadi Miru and Sutarman Yodo. Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2015.
Andi Hamzah. Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2012.
Andi Hamzah. Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2019.
Andi Hamzah. Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2017.
Andi Sofyan and Abd. Asis. Hukum Acara Pidana: Suatu Pengantar. Jakarta: Kencana, 2014.
Celina Tri Siwi Kristiyanti. Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2019.
Eddy O.S. Hiariej. Teori dan Hukum Pembuktian. Jakarta: Erlangga, 2012.
Hamzah, Ismi Fadjriah. “Peran PPNS BPOM dalam Penegakan Hukum Pangan Olahan Impor Ilegal.” Literasi Hukum, 6, no. 1, 2022. https://doi.org/10.31002/lh.v6i1.5670.
Hananta, Dwi. “Pertimbangan Keadaan-Keadaan Meringankan and Memberatkan dalam Penjatuhan Pidana.” Jurnal Hukum and Peradilan, 7, no. 1, 2018, 87–108 https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.7.1.2018.87-108.
Handoko, Yulian Dwi Anggraeni Puspa, Andi Wibowo, Yovia Rizki Arrahman, Pepi Fauziah, and Yuliani. “Implementasi Regulatory Sandbox dalam Konteks Pengawasan Pangan Olahan di Indonesia.” Eruditio: Indonesia Journal of Food and Drug Safety, 5, no. 1. https://doi.org/10.54384/eruditio.v5i1.172.
Hari Sasangka and Lily Rosita. Hukum Pembuktian dalam Perkara Pidana. Bandung: Mandar Maju, 2003.
Indonesia. Peraturan Presiden Nomor 80 Tahun 2017 tentang Badan Pengawas Obat dan Makanan.
Indonesia. Undang-Undang Nomor 18 Tahun 2012 tentang Pangan.
Indonesia. Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2025 tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana.
Indonesia. Undang-Undang Nomor 48 Tahun 2009 tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman.
Indonesia. Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1981 tentang Hukum Acara Pidana.
Indonesia. Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen.
Johnny Ibrahim. Teori and Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif. Malang: Bayumedia Publishing, 2012.
Lilik Mulyadi. Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia. Bandung: PT Citra Aditya Bakti, 2012.
M. Yahya Harahap. Pembahasan Permasalahan dan Penerapan KUHAP: Penyidikan and Penuntutan. Edisi Kedua. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2007.
Moeljatno. Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2008.
Mokoagouw, C. A., W. A. Frederik, and M. R. A. Maramis. “Peran Badan Pengawas Obat dan Makanan dalam Pengawasan Peredaran Produk Makanan Olahan.” Lex Administratum, 11, no. 2, 2023, 1–10.
Mokoagouw, P. C., W. A. Frederik, and R. A. Maramis. “Pengawasan Produk Bahan Makanan Beku (Frozen Food) yang Beredar di Masa Pandemi and Sesudahnya dalam Perspektif Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen.” Innovative: Journal of Social Science Research, 3, no. 4, 2023, 466–475.
Muchsan. Sistem Pengawasan terhadap Perbuatan Aparat Pemerintah dan Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Liberty, 1992.
Natalia, Imelda Hera, and Handoyo Prasetyo. “Tinjauan Yuridis Perlindungan Konsumen Terhadap Pangan Olahan Impor Tanpa Izin Edar: Studi Kasus Pemusnahan Satu Ton Roti Milk Bun Asal Thailand.” Media Hukum Indonesia, 2, no. 3, 2024, 472–479. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12534836.
Nurhayati, Irna. “Efektivitas Pengawasan Badan Pengawas Obat dan Makanan terhadap Peredaran Produk Pangan Olahan Impor dalam Mewujudkan Perlindungan Konsumen.” Mimbar Hukum, 21, no. 2, 2009, 203–216 https://doi.org/10.22146/jmh.16265.
Pasek, Putu Wilsa Nityananda Advaita, and I Dewa Ayu Dwi Mayasari. “Penegakan Hukum terhadap Pelaku Usaha Pangan yang Mengedarkan Air Minum Dalam Kemasan tanpa Izin BPOM.” Kertha Wicara: Journal Ilmu Hukum, 14, no. 5, 2025. https://doi.org/10.24843/KW.2025.v14.i05.p5.
Patrisia Evangeli Manoppo. “Pemidanaan terhadap Pelaku Usaha Pangan yang Memperdagangkan Pangan Olahan dalam Bentuk Kemasan Eceran Tanpa Izin Edar Menurut Pasal 142 Ayat (1) jo. Pasal 91 Ayat (1) UU Nomor 18 Tahun 2012 tentang Pangan jo. UU Nomor 6 Tahun 2023: Kajian Putusan MA no. 5253 K/Pid.Sus/2022.” Lex Administratum, 12, no. 5, 2024.
Pengadilan Negeri Pekanbaru. Putusan Nomor 438/Pid.Sus/2021/PN Pbr, tanggal 10 Agustus 2021.
Peter Mahmud Marzuki. Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana, 2017.
Philipus M. Hadjon, R. Sri Soemantri Martosoewignjo, Sjachran Basah, Bagir Manan, Laica Marzuki, J.B.J.M. ten Berge, P.J.J. van Buuren, and F.A.M. Stroink. Pengantar Hukum Administrasi Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press, 2008.
Rarsina, Jermias T. U. “Perlindungan Konsumen Terhadap Perdagangan Online Produk Pangan Impor yang Tidak Memiliki Izin Edar BPOM.” Paulus Law Journal, 5, no. 1, 2023, 105–115.
Ridwan HR. Hukum Administrasi Negara. Edisi Revisi. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2018.
Ridwan HR. Hukum Administrasi Negara. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2011.
Rio Christiawan and Tuti Widyaningrum. Penelitian Hukum Normatif. Depok: Rajawali Pers, 2024.
Roeslan Saleh. Perbuatan Pidana dan Pertanggungjawaban Pidana: Dua Pengertian Dasar dalam Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Aksara Baru, 1983.
Saputra, Febrian Akhirama, Najmi, and Aria Zurnetti. “Penegakan Hukum oleh Penyidik Pegawai Negeri Sipil (PPNS) Balai Besar Pengawas Obat dan Makanan (BBPOM) Padang terhadap Pangan Olahan Tanpa Izin Edar.” UNES Law Review, 5, no. 4, 2023, 4274–4291 https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v5i4.737.
Soerjono Soekanto and Sri Mamudji. Penelitian Hukum Normatif: Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. Edisi Revisi. Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada, 2019.
Soerjono Soekanto. Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Penegakan Hukum. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2014.
Tresya. “Peran BPOM dalam Melakukan Pengawasan terhadap Pangan Tanpa Izin Edar.” Wajah Hukum, 2, no. 2, 2018, 173–177. https://doi.org/10.33087/wjh.v2i2.38.
Zainuddin Ali. Metode Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2021.