The Juridical Review of Dispute Resolution Models for National Economic Recovery (PEN) Loan by Local Governments
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study aims to examine the legal aspects and dispute resolution models in the implementation of the National Economic Recovery (PEN) loan program by local governments. The main questions in this study are: (1) what are the legal provisions governing the PEN loan mechanism by local governments, and (2) how are disputes arising from its implementation resolved? The method used is a normative legal approach with descriptive-analytical analysis of legislation, legal doctrines, and case studies related to the implementation of PEN loans in several regions. Data were collected through literature review and analyzed through deductive legal logic interpretation. The research findings reveal that the implementation of PEN loans is based on various regulations, including Law No. 17 of 2003, Law No. 2 of 2020, Government Regulation No. 43 of 2020, Minister of Finance Regulation No. 105/PMK.07/2020, and Government Regulation No. 56 of 2018. However, in its implementation, various disputes have arisen due to breach of contract, weak supervision, and differences in contract interpretation. Dispute resolution can be pursued through litigation or non-litigation channels, including through the LAPS SJK. This study highlights the importance of strengthening contractual regulations and institutional frameworks for local governments to ensure more accountable management of public loans and minimize the potential for disputes in a systematic and effective manner.
Article Details
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
References
Aryonegoro, I. A., A. L. Prakoso, dan M. K. S. H. Lembaga Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Sektor Jasa Keuangan (LAPS SJK) (Tinjauan Yuridis terhadap Peran dan Kewenangan dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa di Sektor Perbankan). Disertasi doktoral, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta, 2022.
Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan Perwakilan Provinsi Gorontalo. “Pinjaman Pemulihan Ekonomi Nasional (PEN) Daerah dalam Rangka Pembangunan Infrastruktur: Solusi atau Masalah.” Diakses 15 Juli 2025. https://gorontalo.bpk.go.id/pinjaman-pemulihan-ekonomi-nasional-pinjaman-pen-daerah-dalam-rangka-pembangunan-infrastruktur-solusi-atau-masalah/.
Bate’e, M. M., S. Sipur, dan R. Marisya. “Kebijakan Keuangan Nasional terhadap Permasalahan Ekonomi dan Bisnis Selama Pandemi COVID-19 di Indonesia.” Eqien: Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis 10, no. 2.
Hendra, Joni K., Levi Yani, dan Novi Astria Ningsih. “Dampak Pandemi Covid-19 Terhadap Ekonomi Makro di Indonesia.” BIMA: Journal of Business Inflation Management and Accounting 2, no. 1 (Januari 2025).
Ibrahim, Johnny. Teori & Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif. Malang: Bayumedia Publishing, 2006.
Kasim, M. A., Y. Kadir, R. M. Moonti, M. Bunga, dan S. Pakaya. “Amandemen Konstruksi Hukum Dana Pemulihan Ekonomi Nasional (PEN) untuk Mencegah Adanya Indikasi Korupsi.” Jurnal Darma Agung 13, no. 1.
Mahmud Marzuki, Peter. Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2017.
Oe, M. D. “Penyelesaian Sengketa dalam Perjanjian Pembiayaan Konsumen sebagai Akibat Wanprestasi.” Pranata Hukum 7, no. 1.
Putri, F. S., dan A. Suryono. “Langkah Hukum bagi Peminjam Jasa Pinjaman Pribadi (PINPRI) atas Kerugian yang Ditimbulkan Akibat Kebocoran Data Pribadi.” Perkara: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Politik 2, no. 2.
Sipayung, Baren, dan Amelya Ardiani. “Manajemen Risiko dalam Pertimbangan Pengajuan Pinjaman Dana Pemulihan Ekonomi Nasional (PEN) Daerah.” Kinerja: Jurnal Ekonomi dan Manajemen 19, no. 4.
Tim Penulis CHP. “Lika Liku Lengkap Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen.” Diakses 14 Juli 2025. https://www.chplaw.id/blog/penyelesaian-sengketa-konsumen/.