Implementation of the Principles of Justice and Utility in the Determination of Land Compensation Consignment for Disputed Property
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study aims to answer how the principles of justice and benefit are implemented in determining compensation for disputed land in Decision No. 69/Pdt.P-Kons/2022/PN Gto. This study uses a normative legal method with a legislative approach and case study, where data is collected through literature review of regulations, court decisions, and relevant literature. The results of the study indicate that the judge granted the request for consignment based on Article 42(c) of Law No. 2 of 2012 due to the existence of a ownership dispute that prevented direct payment of compensation. The judge's ratio decidendi emphasized the principle of benefit to ensure the smooth progress of the dam construction project as a public interest, while also guaranteeing the rights of the parties by depositing the compensation funds with the court until the dispute is resolved. This ruling constitutes a legally valid and pragmatic solution to overcome land acquisition obstacles caused by disputes, but it raises a dilemma of timely justice for the entitled parties due to the delay in compensation rights is delayed until the ownership dispute is resolved. The impact of this study highlights the importance of strengthening technical guidelines for the implementation of consignment and accelerating the resolution of ownership disputes to achieve legal certainty and justice for all parties involved in land acquisition for public interest.
Article Details
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
References
Aditya, Muhammad Irfan, Maryano Maryano, dan Ahmad Yani. "Kepastian Hukum dalam Pengadaan Tanah untuk Pembangunan Proyek Strategis Nasional Terkait Ganti Kerugian bagi Masyarakat yang Terdampak." SENTRI: Jurnal Riset Ilmiah 2, no. 9 (2023): 3710–3721.
Azharie, A. "Pemanfaatan Hukum sebagai Sarana untuk Mencapai Keadilan Sosial." Lex Aeterna Law Journal 1, no. 2 (2023): 72–90.
Devi Ramadani. Proses Konsinyasi Ganti Rugi Dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Pengadaan Tanah Bagi Pembangunan Untuk Kepentingan Publik (Studi Di Pengadilan Negeri Medan). Skripsi, Universitas Sumatera Utara, 2021.
Harefa, S. "Penyelesaian Sengketa Tanah Dalam Pengadaan Proyek Jalan Tol Dengan Asas Keadilan." Sosio Yustisia: Jurnal Hukum Dan Perubahan Sosial 2, no. 1 (2022): 140–155.
Lawalata, S. H., J. K. Matuankotta, dan N. Uktolseja. "Konsinyasi/Penitipan Uang Sebagai Bentuk Ganti Rugi Atas Pengalihan Hak Tanah." PAMALI: Pattimura Magister Law Review 1, no. 1 (2021): 16. https://doi.org/10.47268/pamali.v1i1.481.
Mukti Fajar, dan Yulianto Achmad. Dualisme Penelitian Hukum Normatif & Empiris. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2010.
Muhammad Syahrum. Pengantar Metodologi Penelitian Hukum: Kajian Penelitian Normatif, Empiris, Penulisan Proposal, Laporan Skripsi dan Tesis. Jakarta: CV Dotplus Publisher, 2022.
Pengadilan Negeri Bitung. “Apa Itu Konsinyasi.” Artikel Hukum. Diakses 26 Oktober 2024. https://pn-bitung.go.id/index.php/berita/artikel/item/apa-itu-konsinyasi.
Rasdhana, A., dan M. Huda. "Pelakasanaan Ganti Rugi Pengadaan Tanah Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2012." UNES Law Review 6, no. 3 (2024): 8203–8211.
Sahara, W., M. Yamin, dan M. Kaban. "Ganti Kerugian Terhadap Pembebasan Lahan Proyek Pembangunan Irigasi Batang Bayang." Jurnal 2, no. 4 (2023): 343–354.
Soerjono Soekanto, dan Sri Mamudji. Penelitian Hukum Normatif (Suatu Tinjauan Singkat). Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2001.
Sutanto, D. N. Kajian Lembaga Hukum Konsinyasi Ganti Rugi Dan Asas Kesepakatan Dalam Peraturan Pengadaan Tanah Bagi Pembangunan Untuk Kepentingan Umum Dalam Mewujudkan Keadilan Bagi Pemegang Hak Atas Tanah. Disertasi, Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta, 2021.
Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2012 tentang Pengadaan Tanah Bagi Pembangunan Untuk Kepentingan Umum.